🔗 Share this article

A number of Fortnite players are experiencing let down, and this isn't because of recent virtual events. The game's newest limited-time event, which brings a Simpsons-themed map, has also rolled out a brand-new mechanic called pets. There's no deny that the new pets are cute. But, the attached prices have made many fans stunned at this developer's efforts to monetize nearly each part of the game.

What Are Companion Pets?

Sidekicks are essentially like digital creatures, but having a few drawbacks. Players can name them, and they will follow your character during a match. They are indestructible, and you can pet them. Opposing gamers not in the player's party cannot view sidekicks — and showing off your companions is perhaps half the fun of having them. Pets can be outfitted with outfits and emotes, however the controversy centers on their appearance. A sidekick's main design is only able to be altered one time, after which that choice is permanent. Players can select a sidekick's coat color, accent hues, eye colors, markings, and their build size.

A Costly Customization Mechanism

If a player later choose that they'd like your pet to appear slightly altered, you cannot simply continue to modify the appearance. Players must buy another companion. Furthermore, these pets aren't inexpensive. The majority of people are obtaining the banana-themed pet, since it is included in the current battle pass. According to unofficial reports, upcoming pets may be priced at from 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; to put that in perspective, 1,000 V-Bucks is priced at $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks cost $22.99. However, players can change the name of a companion whenever they want.

Community Response and Parallels

The majority of sidekicks have not been officially launched so far, so the pricing may easily change. Yet even if the developer sets sidekicks cheaper, much of the anger comes from the reality that players might have to pay for a one kind of pet multiple times. For some, the pricing scheme feels particularly unfair considering the game has previously introduced pets that ride about as part of back blings. Backpack companions lack a restriction on changes and are visible by fellow participants in the match. Back bling buddies cannot be named or perform gestures, however opposing players are able to sometimes interact with them — which is more favorable than being invisible completely.

The absence of special functions and restricted engagement choices have numerous gamers feeling disappointed. For instance, why is it not possible to a player, for example, interact playfully with their fancy banana dog? Some point out that companions do not always stay close with the player if a match is moving quickly, or observe that Peels takes up two slots in the battle pass — and this supports the notion that the developer is pressuring the community for revenue. Profit-driven is a term that's coming up frequently in such conversations, with some comparing sidekick monetization to other intense pricing schemes in titles like EA Sports FC. Additionally, it adds to the issue that some pets are expected to be more expensive than equivalent outfit counterparts.

"PLEASE avoid buy Sidekicks," urges a highly-voted community post that encourages other gamers to figuratively vote with their wallets.

"I know they're adorable," the thread adds, "we realize they are enjoyable. We are aware we have all been looking forward to them. But the greed on display is disgusting and should not be rewarded."

A Bigger Picture of Virtual Spending

Over the past few years, Fortnite's events and partnerships have grown in scope and ambition, but the no-cost-to-start title still must generate revenue. As such, the total quantity of items players can now buy has become almost excessive. In addition to standard items like back blings, gliders, harvesting tools, and gestures, players might possibly use money on footwear, songs, instruments, building blocks, cars, wheels, vehicle drift colors, battle passes, and a subscription. Sidekicks do not just require payment, and also introduce a host of new revenue options for the company. It is likely, players will soon be in a position to spend for items like sidekick looks, outfits, emotes, and additional engagement features.

Every one of such cosmetics are completely optional and unneeded to enjoy the game, but equipment can still affect a player's community experience. Kids, for instance, at times face teasing for using impressive sufficiently cool outfits. A comparable situation also occurred when the developer launched brand-name kicks, which may be priced from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. The shoe cost model was not well received either, and a few players vowed that they wouldn't fall prey to the temptation at the time. But ultimately, buying shoes grew normalized. Now, sidekicks are additionally pushing the boundaries of what a player might be prepared to pay to stand out amongst the player base.

What is Next for Companion Pets?

Pets are still a relatively new feature, and they exist a title that changes regularly. Some players are sharing that they've received a questionnaire that assesses how people feel about sidekick mechanics and monetization, which could potentially indicate that the company's strategy are still subject to change. But if Fortnite footwear are any indication, companions likely will not become cheaper overall — there will just be a broader selection of prices to shop.

Ultimately, where certain players are expressing anger at Fortnite item costs, different players are feeling nothing but happiness for their new battle royale friends.